NUENDO 5 VS CUBASE 8 SKIN
These changes are literally cosmetic – they’re just a different skin – but the result oozes professionalism. The look of Nuendo has been modified to appear more business-like, with a dark grey rather than a light grey colour scheme, and meters that look like the plasma displays on an upmarket mixing desk. Full MIDI editing is also included, as is the printing and preparation of musical scores, though the latter lags behind the sophistication of dedicated packages, such as Sibelius and Finale. Plug-ins can be set to work on individual audio tracks, and tracks can also be sub-mixed as groups with their own independent plug-in chains. The overall architecture is similar to that of a hardware mixing desk. Each audio clip can be edited individually with features that include high-quality time stretching and tempo/beat matching.
NUENDO 5 VS CUBASE 8 SOFTWARE
As a quick recap that applies to both products, you get as many audio tracks as your PC hardware can handle, aided and abetted by a dizzying selection of software plug-ins. Internally, the Cubase and Nuendo engines are identical, and the only differences are in the appearance and the feature-set. To be honest for me Nuendo isn't a must, although I like the 'L' button on the channels which is a listening bus seperate from the 'in place Solo' 'S' button.īut bear in mind you pay twice the money for this little extra feature. It can be great or not depending how you prefer to work. The biggest difference I would say if you do music is that Nuendo just got a complete control room function. I'm in music and the sole reason I had to go Nuendo was so I can look the SSL computer to Nuendo but even that can be done by now with Cubase alone if you use something like 2Tools from Al Smart. Then you can go higher than 5.1 channels with Nuendo, almost unlimited. You can also run 9-pin and TimeBase synchronizer with Nuendo which you might need for linking video & film. Nuendo has a couple of extra features for video/post-pro. nuendo is darker and Cubase more modern, brighter, futuristic looking. They have a slight different look / skin / colour whatever you want to call it. I worked with both for many years and switched back and forth.įor music people there is no difference. Does the most recent version of cubase have the same new features as the new nuendo version has? (control room section etc) Are there any differences in built-in audio features (fx etx), quality-wise? (I would probably use bought plugins more than built-in ones, but it's always nice to have some built-in utility plugins if they are usable)ģ. Is there any difference in audio quality (audio engine etc) between the two?Ģ. The new control room features in nuendo seemed nice, though.ġ. I am not interested in the film features of nuendo. What is the real difference between cubase and nuendo for someone doing only music. Which I think is really good.īut, here's my "quick" question. They don't "lock" me to a single platform, should I decide to change, and they also don't force me to use a specific brand of hardware. Steinberg products seem attractive since they are available on both platforms etc. I have been using another product earlier, but this DAW software is no longer made for pc (guess which one. I recently attended a nuendo presentation and became interested.
0 kommentar(er)
